Morning Edition — Monday, March 23, 2026

**Good morning. This is The Stovall Report for March 23, 2026.**

Today’s report is a convergence of global crises, strategic tensions, and economic fragility. We’re in a moment where the world is testing the limits of its systems—energy, fiscal, military, and diplomatic. The Middle East is on the brink of a new escalation, the U.S. is facing a fiscal cliff it’s choosing to ignore, and supply chains are under unprecedented strain. These are not isolated events. They are threads in a larger fabric of global instability.

Let’s begin with the most immediate and dangerous development: Iran’s threat to close the Strait of Hormuz in response to U.S. pressure. This is not just a geopolitical maneuver—it’s a direct challenge to the global energy infrastructure that underpins modern civilization.

---

**Iran threatens to ‘completely’ close Strait of Hormuz, hit power plants after Trump threat**

Iran’s announcement of a potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for global oil transit, comes in the wake of a U.S. diplomatic pressure campaign led by President Trump. The Strait, which sees about 20% of the world’s oil passing through, is a strategic linchpin. If Iran were to close it, the consequences would be catastrophic—global oil supply would plunge, energy prices would skyrocket, and the global economy could face a crisis of unprecedented scale.

This is a test of Western resilience. The U.S. and its allies are under pressure to respond, but the question is whether they can act without triggering a full-scale military conflict. The stakes are civilizational. If the Strait is closed, the global economy could suffer a shock similar to the 1973 oil embargo, which led to stagflation and economic turmoil. The current situation is more dangerous because the infrastructure targeted—power plants, refineries, and shipping lanes—are not just military assets; they are the lifeblood of global energy systems.

The historical thread here is clear. In 1973, during the Yom Kippur War, Egypt and Syria used the Strait of Hormuz as a weapon, cutting off oil supplies to the West. The result was a global economic crisis that lasted for years. Today, the same logic applies, but with a much more dangerous twist. The current escalation is not just about oil—it’s about the control of energy infrastructure, the ability to disrupt global supply chains, and the test of Western alliances.

What to watch next: Trump’s 48-hour deadline for a response creates a hard cliff. If he doesn’t act, the situation could spiral into direct military conflict. The global oil markets will react within hours, signaling the probability of supply disruption. The world is watching to see whether the U.S. can act decisively or whether this becomes a crisis of inaction.

---

**Washington ignores America's fiscal cliff**

While the Middle East is on the brink of a new war, the United States is facing a fiscal crisis that is being ignored by Congress. The Congressional Budget Office has projected that annual deficits will reach 6% of GDP by 2036, a level not seen since the 1940s. This is not just a financial problem—it’s a civilizational one. The U.S. is running up debt that could outstrip its ability to service it, leading to a crisis of default or severe austerity.

The article highlights how specific policy decisions—tax cuts, war spending, and the rejection of tariff authority—have exacerbated the problem. The stakes are high. If the U.S. continues down this path, it could face a crisis similar to that of the late Roman Empire, where fiscal exhaustion led to the collapse of the state. The political inability to act is a direct parallel to the failure of Athens before the Macedonian conquest.

What to watch next: The bond market is already showing signs of stress. Interest rate pressures could force a fiscal reckoning before 2032, when Social Security is projected to be depleted. The dollar’s reserve status is under pressure, and if the U.S. fails to act, it could lose its position as the world’s reserve currency.

---

**Unprecedented blasts reported in Tehran as Israel announces wave of strikes**

In the Middle East, the conflict is intensifying. Israel has announced a wave of strikes on Iranian government infrastructure in Tehran, with multiple independent confirmations. This is not a skirmish—it’s a deliberate, announced military operation. The strikes target government facilities, not just military assets, indicating a strategic escalation.

The implications are clear. This is a test of the region’s stability. If Iran retaliates, it could trigger a full-scale war. The U.S. is under pressure to respond, but the question is whether it can act without escalating the conflict. The density of strikes across multiple locations suggests that Israel is trying to degrade Iran’s command and control capabilities, not just inflict damage.

Historically, strikes on government infrastructure in capital cities have been a precursor to total war or major diplomatic realignment. The current situation is a return to the Cold War-era brinkmanship that defined the 1960s and 1970s. The question is whether this will lead to a new Cold War or a new global crisis.

What to watch next: The timing of Iranian retaliation is critical. If it comes quickly, it could force a rapid escalation. The U.S. military posture is under pressure, and the question is whether a ceasefire will be negotiated or whether the conflict will spiral further.

---

**'Crisis worse than two 1970s oil shocks put together': IEA chief's big warning on Hormuz**

The International Energy Agency has issued a stark warning: a crisis in the Strait of Hormuz could be worse than the combined impact of the 1973 and 1979 oil shocks. This is not just a warning—it’s a signal that the global economy is on the edge of a crisis.

The IEA’s statement is based on the fact that 10-20% of global oil supply passes through the Strait. If it is closed, the impact on the global economy would be catastrophic. The article doesn’t provide specific policy recommendations, but the stakes are clear. This is a signal that mainstream institutions are recognizing the severity of the situation.

Historically, the 1973 oil shock led to a 48% crash in oil prices, triggering stagflation that lasted for years. The current situation is more dangerous because the global economy is more interconnected. The impact of a Hormuz closure would be felt immediately, not just in the short term.

What to watch next: The world is watching to see whether the U.S. will act to prevent a supply disruption. If the Strait is closed, the global economy could face a crisis that is worse than any previous oil shock. The fertilizer shortage that could follow is a critical concern, as the global food system is already under strain.

---

**What Do Bonds Know That The Stock Market Doesn't?**

In the financial world, there is a growing divergence between the stock market and the bond market. The CDX Index, which measures credit default swaps, is reaching nine-month highs while the S&P 500 remains within 5% of its all-time high. This is a clear signal that the market is pricing in a potential correction.

The article explains that this divergence is a historical pattern. Every time the CDX Index reaches these levels, a bear market follows. The mechanism is clear: credit spreads signal a decline in risk appetite, which is a key indicator of economic stress.

Historically, this has been a reliable predictor. The 2007 financial crisis, the 2015 correction, and the 2022 Fed rate hikes all followed this pattern. The current situation is a warning that the market is on the edge of a correction.

What to watch next: The S&P 500 could drop significantly, with the timing of the correction being a key factor. The Fed may intervene with liquidity measures, and the correlation between the stock and bond markets will be critical in determining the depth of the correction.

---

**Glitch Shuts Australia's Biggest Maker of Vital Fertilizer Input For 2 Months At Worst Possible Time**

The fertilizer crisis in Australia is a critical issue that could have far-reaching consequences. A major glitch at Yara Pilbara has shut down 5% of global ammonia production, which is a vital input for fertilizers. This is a supply chain crisis that could lead to food shortages and higher input costs for farmers.

The article provides specific details: 1.2 million tonnes of Australian urea imports are expected in April and May, and 330,000 tonnes of TAN production is offline. This is a critical time for the global food system, as the world is already under strain from the energy crisis.

Historically, fertilizer shortages have led to food security crises. The 2021 Sri Lankan fertilizer crisis is a direct parallel. The current situation is a test of the global food system’s resilience.

What to watch next: The Australian fertilizer market is under pressure, and the price of urea is likely to rise sharply. The timing of the crisis is critical, as the world is already under strain from the energy crisis.

---

**Carlos Fernández de Cossío: Cuba 'preparing' for 'possibility of military aggression'**

In Cuba, the situation is escalating. A senior Cuban official has confirmed that the country is preparing for the possibility of military aggression in response to U.S. statements about taking over Cuba. This is a direct challenge to the U.S. and a return to Cold War-era brinkmanship.

The article provides direct quotes from a Cuban official, confirming that the country is preparing for a military response. This is a significant escalation, as it shows that Cuba is willing to take a hard line in response to U.S. rhetoric.

Historically, this echoes the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, when the U.S. and Soviet Union were on the brink of nuclear war. The current situation is a return to that pattern of confrontation.

What to watch next: The U.S. is under pressure to respond to Cuban rhetoric. The question is whether Trump will escalate beyond rhetoric or whether the situation will lead to a military confrontation.

---

**AP News Summary at 2:40 p.m. EDT**

This is the same as the previous story, but it provides a more detailed summary of the situation in the Strait of Hormuz. The article highlights the potential for a direct military conflict between the U.S. and Iran, given the current tensions.

The historical context is clear: the Strait of Hormuz has been a strategic point since the Eisenhower era. Iran’s asymmetric leverage is a direct challenge to the global energy infrastructure. The last comparable escalation was the Tanker War in the 1980s, which ended in a gradual de-escalation.

What to watch next: The world is watching to see whether Iran will actually close the Strait or whether this remains a bluff. The oil markets will react within hours, and the U.S. is under pressure to act.

---

**Before you go — today the Church remembers Turibius of Mogrovejo (1538-1606).**

Turibius of Mogrovejo was a Spanish missionary and Jesuit priest who lived in the 16th century. He is remembered for his deep faith, his commitment to the poor, and his unwavering belief in the power of prayer and spiritual devotion. Despite the challenges he faced, including the threat of being burned at the stake, he remained steadfast in his mission to serve the people of the Andes.

Turibius’s life serves as a powerful reminder that even the most unlikely individuals can make a profound impact when they stand up for what is right, despite the obstacles and challenges that may lie ahead. His story is a testament to the power of faith, perseverance, and service.

Have a good day.